In 2014, the Senate Intelligence Committee's
papers and email accounts belonging to certain senators' staffers were
compromised by individuals working under acting CIA Director John Brennan's
supervision. Brennan took a stance on the issue. He said at the Council of
Foreign Relations, "'Nothing could be further from the truth,' 'We
wouldn't do that. I mean, that's just beyond the scope of reason." Later
on, he finally had to admit guilt as the inspector general uncovered the
hacking. Brennan should be sacked, according to left-leaning media, including
the Washington Post.
Today, critics have come
to his defense because his security clearance was removed in 2018, long after
he wasn't working for the government anymore but rather for CNN. He had other
issues as well, he leaked critical information about a double agent who was
still working in the field which could have gotten the agent killed. There are
people living in tents in one of the most expensive places in the country such
as downtown LA California! The homeless population is exploding in California.
One of the reasons for the increase is illegal immigration! Open borders create
government dependence rather independence for the individual, it also creates a
burden for the community while disrespecting the laws of the land.
Some lawmakers mainly in
left-leaning districts have put illegals in a position to fail. Think about it.
You invite the world to come and live in your city, but most of them don't have
the job skills to live in such a high society! Therefore, they become depended
on the government for many years and thus, getting more votes to get certain
political figures in office, and creating more government control over people's
lives! Mexico has also benefitted from illegal immigration because many
illegals have sent billions of dollars back to that country over the years.
Legal immigration has
made a positive impact on America, although it still needs some adjusting with
some tweaks to make it easier for legal immigrants to become citizens but
illegal immigration has been used as a tool for political power. There are other
issues which can be addressed perhaps in a future article in regards to
immigration policy, but I just narrowed it down to make a point.
Education is an
important issue, especially in today's world. Each side of the political
spectrum both Democratic and Republican brag how much money they either want to
spend or are spending on education. There has been a great deal of research
over the years about how much students retain from their education and how much
of their job skills are learned from education compared to on the job. Also
research on how much their education teaches them about culture, politics,
religion, science and how employers use education as a way to judge people in
regards to intelligence, and future work ethic.
When your educational
credentials are stronger than your ability you earn more but if your
educational credentials are weaker than your ability, you earn less. Other
factors play a role as well, like in the case of promotions, the employer may
judge you on certain educational tests, if your test is higher than your
co-workers, you earn more, if it's lower, you earn less. Testing is considered
more important. Human bias also plays a factor. But in a quest for political
power, education is a powerful tool to advance a particular agenda, if the
educational system is mainly under a certain political slant which it is.
Innovation is important, but under the educational system, only 5 percent of
the students major in engineering and 2 percent major in computer science while
5 percent of the students major in biology and biomedical science. Most of the
brightest stay at the universities as professors using their skills of
creativity only for academic purposes with no real commercial value.
How important is the
education? Is education more important than recruiting businesses to your
district? Are both equally important? For the quest for political power,
education on both sides is vitally important. It's way more than just teaching
a student job skill, in 1936, the National Educational Association stated,
"We stand for socializing the individual…The major function of the school
is the social orientation of the individual…Education must operate according to
a well-formulated social policy." Moreover, Paul Haubner, an NEA
specialist once said in regards to public education, "We must change their
values."
This has been the
propose of public education since it began in the 1840s. If companies judge
more by educational advancement and local or state governments make it easier
for more students to go to college even though higher education can become
extremely expensive, the culture will be more educated under a certain
political slant which they believe will help them not only to get into power of
running a country but to stay there for a long time.
During President
Lincoln's time, Democrats who were trying to rewrite history claimed the
Declaration of Independence which stated "All men are created equal"
did not include blacks. Lincoln rebukes the illogic with this..."I
believe the entire records of the world, from the date of the Declaration of
Independence up until 3 years ago, may be searched in vain for one single
affirmation, from one single man, that the Negro was not included in the
Declaration of Independence."
In today's political
war, racism and even slavery which has been abolished for many years are still
being used as a political tool by Democrats who embrace socialism. Because
historically blacks favored socialism more than capitalism. In the 1930's when the
New Deal was being implemented, which taught entitlement, redistribution of
wealth, we find there was an increase in blacks favoring Democrats even though
at the time, Democrats were very openly racist as they did not consider blacks
being equal with whites. But they were starting to win them over with
government programs. Entitlement meant more power for the government and less
power for the people. It was the new plantation. Progressives wanted to change
the culture if that culture was considered racist for example, it would
implement government programs to fix the problem.
For example, in 2000,
President Robert Mugabe took farmland away from white farmers for a cost of 20
billion, which caused an economic meltdown. Shortages of food, and consumer
goods which eventually lead to massive inflation. Currently, South Africa wants
to model itself with what Mugabe did because they say, blacks are growing
impatient (feeling entitled), they want their land back! Unless the new owners
are as good as the old ones, this would also cause an economic meltdown. And
bring about unnecessary hardship on its people whose standard of living would
drop but this would cause more control for the communist government which is
the objective. Unlike the North and South Democrats who were fighting for
slavery while Republicans located in just in the North were fighting against
slavery.
Randomly taking land
away from a certain group to give to another isn't correcting a wrong! Even
though the founders of America wrote in some Biblical principles like "all
men are created equal" they were influenced by secularism of their time so
they made mistakes! These mistakes were later corrected which was in line with
"all men are created equal" in the original document (Declaration of
Independence) which became part of our government.
North Korea is another
prime example of a country using communism/socialism in order to control
people's lives. Donated food is often times taken by the government from other
countries or private organizations because the North Korean government wants control
over the flow of everyday life which includes food. The country is considered
either a prison or modern-day slavery camp.
America's aging
population is also being used as a weapon for the political war. Each President
no matter which side has made some sort of promise to make Social Security and
Medicare strong usually by similar methods with a few modifications that makes them
slightly different for each party. Many people who have older relatives that
require special places to live for their medical and safety needs like nursing
homes know that Medicare doesn't pay dollar for dollar for those needs.
Some nursing homes
become private as they cannot stay afloat by accepting those strictly on
Medicare. Others have restrictions such as a required amount of money before
one goes on Medicare. While places like California want to invite the whole
world into its cities, the state is not meeting the needs of the elderly and
the future of the baby boom generation when they retire.
How would you like the
government to control your money? In a way, it does already through various
government programs. To assist us in retirement, we contribute to social
security, but where does the money go? It doesn't go into the bank! Nor does it
go into a trust fund to be later used for retirees! The government spends
social security right away. How long did you think you would last if your whole
paycheck was spent right away? But doesn't the government borrow to pay it
back? Yes, it does! But the government's ability to keep borrowing and maintain
trillions of dollars of government programs is dwelling.
The baby-boom generation
in 2030 will have 80 million more people drawing from the system. But what if
people take more control over their retirement money? IRAs and Roths have shown
many people are not spending that money right away, it remains in investments
and the returns are so much higher than what the government will give you or
may not be able to give you in the future.
Then there is capitalism
as it began to flourish in the Southern United States, people left the
Democratic party and became Republicans, the trend of racism went down. In
fact, most of the old Dixie Democrats like in the 50s and 60's who advocated
inequality among blacks and whites remained with the party only two left to
join the Republican party.
In this political war,
the American people will have to make some tough decisions coming to this
mid-term election for 2018 and elections after that, the question remains, are
they willing to let the government control their lives in exchange for government
programs, or are they going allow people to succeed in life or fail? Are they
going to allow competition or are they going to let the government take over?
Yes, this is one big political war because of its impact on the lives of the
present and future!
America
Political war
American
Civil War
An American Way of Political Warfare
No comments